Banking
If the banks to retain or even increase their already high dividends is that “a signal” low “? The banks have sources of income other than sub-prime mortgages. While growth may be difficult for the next coming year are the other areas is really good. Barclays said that even after the depreciation of all its bad debts (they are probably a large part of this trip), they should match last years numbers. Growth World (not the UK or U.S.) is still strong and great players deserve a big chunk of the total distance of these shores.
As Simon Denom of Capital Spreads said, “The reason for the extreme weakness of the operator, such as Bradford & Bingley, is that many of their eggs in one basket (aka Northern Rock) have. They are strong on the growth of the United Kingdom. Forays your abroad, already seem a surprise to many investors brought nothing but pain, which will obviously create a tortoise as a retirement in the dubious “safe harbor” for the UK market as well as for looks clients.
For those who lack the protection of land against price losses, lessons from Japan (think more “green belt” protecting nation that the United Kingdom) educational institutions. It was the efforts of banks out there, like the huge drop in property values. Suddenly a part of the property has dropped 70% since its peak and we can only hope the same does not happen again.
The message seemed so hard to go wrong, it can take a step back and ask, “we’re just too negative” to our own well-being. Yes, the problems leading to the subprime credit crunch problems “growth” concerns real problems etc etc, but how and important.
The whole problem started with some unusual waiver of the normal criteria for granting mortgage loans in the bad credit segment of the consumer sector of the United States. But what is the size of this sector and how what looks like a small percentage of the total, have a great influence on banks, many of which seem at first sight, are not actually in the arena of U.S. mortgages. For some readers it may seem strange that banks are now forced large parts of the new capital to negotiate better prices problem as a relatively minor problem. The problem is that banks money in the margins. If a bank can lend you money for 7 5% does not mean that they were referring May 7%. The Bank itself has to borrow money elsewhere (about 6%) and then returns it makes a difference. When the bank looked good in their job, he will take this room several times, but always the risk of giving money, as always be able to repay the money. On this basis, it is clear that the relatively low level of bad loans, a bank can quickly get into trouble. A loss of 100% on a loan takes some First 5% s. This goes a long way to explain why banks still seem very attractive returns for commercial investors. Even in boom times, banks are rarely more than 12-13 times earnings, because they know that investors may be a slowdown in the corner.
And to Paris as a leading professional distribution, it suffers recently, “The United States, because housing prices have been enriched fast track to a country that has a very good product in abundance,” Country ” . In the United Kingdom (although there are many more 100% mortgages), most loans are well covered, and the value of the asset, the house is almost certainly the most debt anyway. Thus, the risk to the bank as interest. In countries where much land is the potential for wild swings in house appraisals that much more important. When the lender return the key to many properties that it had a value of only 75-80% of the original loan, then the crisis is waiting in the wings. ”
Spread paris carry a high risk and may not be suitable for all categories of investors. Only trade with money you can afford to lose. Make sure you understand the risks involved. If necessary, seek independent financial advice.